Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-02-07 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-02-07 Senate Journal Page 2326 HB 32 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 32(FIN) An Act relating to administrative proceedings involving a determination of eligibility for a permanent fund dividend or authority to claim a dividend on behalf of another; and providing for an effective date was read the second time. Senator Taylor offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 1, line 9: Delete request the department to review its decision. Insert file an appeal with the department. Within eight months after an appeal is filed, the department shall provide the individual with a written decision. If the department fails to provide the written decision within the eight-month period, all issues raised in the appeal shall be considered to have been decided in favor of the individual. Page 2, line 14: Delete January 1, 1996 Insert January 1, 1997 Senator Taylor moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Duncan objected, then withdrew his objection. There being no further objections, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. 1996-02-07 Senate Journal Page 2327 HB 32 Senator Zharoff offered Amendment No. 2 : Page 1, lines 8 and 9: Delete , upon payment of a $25 appeal fee, Page 1, line 9, after the period: Insert If an individual is aggrieved by an informal conference decision, the individual may, upon payment of a $25 appeal fee, request a formal hearing before the commissioner. Senator Zharoff moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2. Without objection, Amendment No. 2 was adopted. Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 32(FIN) am S was read the third time. The question being: Shall CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 32(FIN) am S An Act relating to administrative proceedings involving a determination of eligibility for a permanent fund dividend or authority to claim a dividend on behalf of another; and providing for an effective date pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 32(FIN) am S Third Reading - Final Passage YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, R.Phillips, Salo, Zharoff and so, CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 32(FIN) am S passed the Senate. Senator Halford moved the effective date clause. 1996-02-07 Senate Journal Page 2328 HB 32 The question being: Shall the effective date clause be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 32(FIN) am S Effective Date Vote YEAS: 16 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis and so, the effective date clause was adopted. Senator Adams gave notice of reconsideration.